333.i2p

Hi

(Unfortunately I don't understand the Russian language so please change the category of this thread if the default one is not correct.)

Does anyome here use LibreWolf as a browser for I2P? What are pitfalls? LibreWolf is a more privacy focused browser but it might provide different HTTP header data, or do other things that could be dangerous from a fingerprinting perspective.

I'm gonna let orignal decide whether he wants to delete this reply.

As with your other question, Dude, part of the name of LibreWolf is that it is Libre, as in get a fucking paper dictionary if you do not want to use an online translation tool. You know, like the ones they used to have in the past.

Lol. Too right. Unfortunately an offline translation tool isn't readily accessible though. I'll probably raise a few eyebrows if I go out and get a "fucking paper dictionary". Also its a grammar and 'turn of phrase' issue to try and manually translate words.

But I like your jest.

I already replied to you in your other thread.

Readily available == easy == you don't have to put in effort == you become stupid.

Oh, I'm sorry, the word "stupid" is offensive. Let's replace it with "intellectually challenged" :)

zlatinb wrote:

...Dude, part of the name of LibreWolf is that it is Libre, as in get a fucking paper dictionary if you do not want to use an online translation...Readily available == easy == you don't have to put in effort == you become stupid...

You sure don't sound like the old zab. And in fact your rant has nothing to do at all with what he asked. You say,"...it is Libre..." but that has not one damn thing to do with what he asked,

He asked,

"... but it might provide different HTTP header data, or do other things that could be dangerous from a fingerprinting perspective..."

Libre=“at liberty, free; clear, free, vacant; free, without obligation”

Well something can readily be free but have all sorts of spyware, bad headers, fingerprinting. You are just being nasty to him for no reason at all. You're going out of your way to be nasty. You could have just ignored him. It's not like he personally held you down for an answer. You do not sound like zab. Would a person so concerned about their soul and spiritual welfare that he wanted to join a monastery act so mean and vicious, while totally not even addressing the point made in the first place. This doesn't sound like that person that wants to be spiritually enlightened. Sounds more like...a vicious Jew to me.

VargThePissed wrote:

zlatinb wrote:

...Dude, part of the name of LibreWolf is that it is Libre, as in get a fucking paper dictionary if you do not want to use an online translation...Readily available == easy == you don't have to put in effort == you become stupid...

You sure don't sound like the old zab. And in fact your rant has nothing to do at all with what he asked. You say,"...it is Libre..." but that has not one damn thing to do with what he asked,

He asked,

"... but it might provide different HTTP header data, or do other things that could be dangerous from a fingerprinting perspective..."

Libre=“at liberty, free; clear, free, vacant; free, without obligation”

Well something can readily be free but have all sorts of spyware, bad headers, fingerprinting. You are just being nasty to him for no reason at all. You're going out of your way to be nasty. You could have just ignored him. It's not like he personally held you down for an answer. You do not sound like zab. Would a person so concerned about their soul and spiritual welfare that he wanted to join a monastery act so mean and vicious, while totally not even addressing the point made in the first place. This doesn't sound like that person that wants to be spiritually enlightened. Sounds more like...a vicious Jew to me.

Very interesting point Varg. I wonder if you are projecting much, because in your other posts here you sound kind of nasty and mean to me.

Wrath is a Sin. I'm human, and humans sin. I'm not going to get every step of the way right, to think that would be Pride.

I also interested to know if librewolf traffic is different, especially from the perspective of Firefox. I use the liberwolf browser all the time. I remember reading it adds a DNT header, so maybe this is an alarm for the librewolf user??

Do I2P systems remove this header request? maybe someone can check.